netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] TX throttling bug-fixing patch of AX88179

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1374750101.23313.16.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Thu, 25 Jul 2013 04:01:41 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Cc:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
	Grant Grundler <grundler@...gle.com>,
	Freddy Xin <freddy@...x.com.tw>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ASIX Louis [蘇威陸] 
	<louis@...x.com.tw>, Allan Chou <allan@...x.com.tw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] TX throttling bug-fixing patch of AX88179_178A

On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 13:25 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 10:28 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> It depends if size of sg buffer(except for last one) in the sg list can be
> >> divided by usb endpoint's max packet size(512 or 1024), at least there
> >> is the constraint:
> >>
> >> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git/commit/?h=usb-next&id=10e232c597ac757e7f8600649f7e872e86de190f
> >>
> >> I am wondering if network stack can meet that.  If not, it might be a
> >> bit difficult
> >> because lots of USB host controller don't support that, and driver may have
> >> to support SG and non-SG at the same time for working well on all HCs.
> >
> > I do not see the problem.
> >
> > If one skb has 2 fragments of 32KB, couldn't they be split into 64 1K
> > segments by the device driver ?
> 
> OK, if length of fragments of all SKBs from network stack can always guarantee
> to be divided by 1024, that is fine,  seems I worry about too much, :-)

Unfortunately, there is no such guarantee. TSO permits sendfile() zero
copy operation, so the frags can be of any size, any offset...

In this mode, the first element (skb->head) will typically contains the
headers, and there are way below 512 bytes.

So even with lowering netdev->gso_max_size under PAGE_SIZE, most of the
packets will need to be copied into a single segment.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html