[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130726144316.GB3890@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 16:43:16 +0200
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
Cc: nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, davem@...emloft.net,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
steffen.klassert@...unet.com, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: split rt_genid for ipv4 and ipv6
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:49:35PM +0800, Fan Du wrote:
> diff --git a/security/selinux/include/xfrm.h
> b/security/selinux/include/xfrm.h
> index 65f67cb..4f72d2c 100644
> --- a/security/selinux/include/xfrm.h
> +++ b/security/selinux/include/xfrm.h
> @@ -50,8 +50,14 @@ int selinux_xfrm_decode_session(struct sk_buff *skb, u32
> *sid, int ckall);
>
> static inline void selinux_xfrm_notify_policyload(void)
> {
> + struct net *net;
> +
> atomic_inc(&flow_cache_genid);
> - rt_genid_bump(&init_net);
> + rtnl_lock();
> + for_each_net(net) {
> + rt_genid_bump_all(net);
> + }
> + rtnl_unlock();
> }
> #else
> static inline int selinux_xfrm_enabled(void)
>
>
> Let me know if I miss something inside it. Thanks.
I do think it is the correct change. The locking seems correct, too. I will
excercise the code with lockdep as soon as you publish a new patch.
Greetings,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists