[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1375063735.32309.32.camel@jtkirshe-mobl>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 19:08:55 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 00/12][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates
On Sun, 2013-07-28 at 17:20 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 16:11:38 -0700
>
> > On Sun, 2013-07-28 at 13:21 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >> From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> >> Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 04:41:04 -0700
> >>
> >> > This series contains updates to e100 and e1000e.
> >> >
> >> > The e100 patch from Andy simply updates the netif_printk() to use
> >> > %*ph to dump small buffers.
> >> >
> >> > The changes to e1000e include a fix from Dean Nelson to resolve a
> >> > issue where a pci_clear_master() was accidentally dropped during a
> >> > conflict resolution. Wei Young provides 2 patches, one removes an
> >> > assignment of the default ring size because it was a duplicate. The
> >> > second changes the packet split receive structure to use
> >> > PS_PAGE_BUFFERS macro for the length so that problems won't occur
> >> > when the length is changed.
> >> >
> >> > The remaining patches for e1000e are from Bruce Allan, where he
> >> > provides a number of fixes and updates for I218. In addition, a
> >> > fix for 82583 which can disappear off the PCIe bus, to resolve this,
> >> > disable ASPM L1. Bruce also provides a fix to a previous commit
> >> > (commit e60b22c5b7 e1000e: fix accessing to suspended device) so that
> >> > devices are only taken out of runtime power management for those
> >> > ethtool operations that must access device registers.
> >> >
> >> > The following are changes since commit dcfe8048de66c3468060c8a2ec2c04ae3725d002:
> >> > bonding: remove bond_resend_igmp_join_requests read_unlock leftover
> >> > and are available in the git repository at:
> >> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/net-next master
> >>
> >> Pulled, thanks a lot Jeff.
> >
> > It looks like you pulled my net tree instead of my net-next tree.
> > Fortunately, I did not have anything applied to my net tree that had not
> > already been sent out.
>
> No, really, I did this:
>
> git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/net-next master
Disregard, it was me misreading my git log in my net tree after updating
it against your latest tree.
When will your kernel.org net-next be updated? I ask because I have a
series for ixgbe I am putting together and wanted to make sure it is
against the latest net-next.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists