netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] net/usb/r815x: replace USB buffer from stack to DMA-able

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:41:17 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, hayeswang@...ltek.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, nic_swsd@...ltek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] net/usb/r815x: replace USB buffer from stack to
 DMA-able

On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 11:33 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 07:00:59 -0700
> 
> > This call is so slow, you can afford to make a call to kmalloc for the
> > data, as it sure just did for other structures it needed :)
> 
> I told him to implement things this way, to avoid calling kmalloc every
> single register access.
> 
> Using kmalloc all the time makes the access fragile, since a badly timed
> call during high memory pressure can fail.
> 
> I'd rather the potential failure happen at one time, probe time.
> 
> In any event, Ming Lei has suggested using usbnet_{read,write}_cmd()
> instead, which sounds like a good solution to this problem.

Those do per-call allocs too.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html