[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51F95B21.5020004@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 20:44:49 +0200
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, andy@...yhouse.net, davem@...emloft.net,
fubar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] bonding: convert to list API and replace
bond's custom list
On 07/31/2013 08:37 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 17:12:29 +0200
> Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
>> index 390061d..80e288c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
>> @@ -143,10 +143,13 @@ static inline struct bonding *__get_bond_by_port(struct port *port)
>> */
>> static inline struct port *__get_first_port(struct bonding *bond)
>> {
>> + struct slave *first_slave;
>> +
>> if (bond->slave_cnt == 0)
>> return NULL;
>> + first_slave = bond_first_slave(bond);
>
> As Jay said, it would be be better to have bond_first_slave return
> NULL (if no slaves), and eliminate slave_cnt. It would also fix
> a race here between slave_cnt and all slave's being removed.
>
Hi Stephen,
First off - thank you for the review.
What do you mean by eliminate slave_cnt ?
We need it for various calculations throughout the bonding.
There's no race here because read_lock(&bond->lock) is held every time this
is called and slave_cnt can change only under write_lock of the same lock,
the 3ad code is not yet converted to RCU.
Nik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists