netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4] net: split rt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130731.145710.1507535169314670977.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	hannes@...essinduktion.org
Cc:	fan.du@...driver.com, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
	yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
	steffen.klassert@...unet.com, paul@...l-moore.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] net: split rt_genid for ipv4 and ipv6

From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:07:02 +0200

> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 08:33:53AM +0800, Fan Du wrote:
>> Current net name space has only one genid for both IPv4 and IPv6, it has below
>> drawbacks:
>> 
>> - Add/delete an IPv4 address will invalidate all IPv6 routing table entries.
>> - Insert/remove XFRM policy will also invalidate both IPv4/IPv6 routing table
>>   entries even when the policy is only applied for one address family.
>> 
>> Thus, this patch attempt to split one genid for two to cater for IPv4 and IPv6
>> separately in a fine granularity.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
> 
> Also this patch only applies with some fuzz, it addressed all my issues:
> 
> Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>

Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html