[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130731.152458.92056892741307118.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: skb_orphan() changes
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 16:11:15 -0700
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> It is illegal to set skb->sk without corresponding destructor.
>
> Its therefore safe for skb_orphan() to not clear skb->sk if
> skb->destructor is not set.
>
> Also avoid clearing skb->destructor if already NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Applied, but personally I would have considered adding an
else clause checking BUG_ON(skb->sk), or are you not so
confident in your assertion? :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists