[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130801.225147.1055884690165323608.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 22:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com
Cc: amwang@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next 1/2] net: fix a compile error when
CONFIG_NET_LL_RX_POLL is not set
From: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 06:04:11 +0300
> On 01/08/2013 23:03, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
>> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 16:08:07 +0800
>>
>>> Thinking about it again, what is the point of your commit commit
>>> 89bf1b5a683df497c572c4d3bd3f9c9aa919d773 (net: remove NET_LL_RX_POLL
>>> config menue)? After that commit, CONFIG_NET_LL_RX_POLL is not visible
>>> by user and no other configs select it, also since it defaults to y, it
>>> will be _always_ enabled. If this is really what you want, we can simply
>>> remove all !CONFIG_NET_LL_RX_POLL code.
>>
>> Yes we could do that, it has no dependencies which is the usual reason
>> to have a hidden Kconfig var like this.
>
> I think we still need a config option that depends on net and the
> placeholder code.
> What happens then if someone does not configure networking?
> Won't this break select and poll?
Good point.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists