[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130802082404.600bc55c@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 08:24:04 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] htb: fix sign extension bug
On Fri, 02 Aug 2013 06:36:20 -0700
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 22:32 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > When userspace passes a large priority value
> > the assignment of the unsigned value hopt->prio
> > to signed int cl->prio causes cl->prio to become negative and the
> > comparison is with TC_HTB_NUMPRIO is always false.
> >
> > The result is that HTB crashes by referencing outside
> > the array when processing packets. With this patch the large value
> > wraps around like other values outside the normal range.
> >
> > See: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60669
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
> >
> > --- a/net/sched/sch_htb.c 2013-06-20 09:22:46.489542435 -0700
> > +++ b/net/sched/sch_htb.c 2013-08-01 22:12:43.736307055 -0700
> > @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ struct htb_class {
> > struct psched_ratecfg ceil;
> > s64 buffer, cbuffer;/* token bucket depth/rate */
> > s64 mbuffer; /* max wait time */
> > - int prio; /* these two are used only by leaves... */
> > + u32 prio; /* these two are used only by leaves... */
> > int quantum; /* but stored for parent-to-leaf return */
> >
> > struct tcf_proto *filter_list; /* class attached filters */
> > --
>
> Thanks Stephen.
>
> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> It seems appropriate for net tree (and stable)
>
> We probably should report an error from htb_change_class() ?
There are more signed/unsigned bugs lurking here, and opportunities to
shrink the structure. (for example prio could be u8). Overall this code
uses int where unsigned should be used.
Examples:
static inline void htb_add_class_to_row(struct htb_sched *q,
struct htb_class *cl, int mask)
{
q->row_mask[cl->level] |= mask;
while (mask) {
int prio = ffz(~mask);
mask &= ~(1 << prio);
htb_add_to_id_tree(&q->hlevel[cl->level].hprio[prio].row, cl, prio);
}
}
Could be:
static void htb_add_class_to_row(struct htb_sched *q,
struct htb_class *cl, u8 mask)
{
q->row_mask[cl->level] |= mask;
while (mask) {
u8 prio = ffz(~mask);
mask &= ~(1 << prio);
htb_add_to_id_tree(&q->hlevel[cl->level].hprio[prio].row, cl, prio);
}
}
Looks like all use of int in HTB should be re-evaluated to see if a smaller unsigned
type could be used instead.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists