lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 14:51:46 -0700 (PDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: pmoore@...hat.com Cc: amwang@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, james.l.morris@...cle.com, sds@...ho.nsa.gov, eparis@...isplace.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v2 8/8] selinux: use generic union inet_addr From: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com> Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 10:34:07 -0400 > On Friday, August 02, 2013 03:14:34 PM Cong Wang wrote: >> From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com> >> >> selinux has some similar definition like union inet_addr, >> it can re-use the generic union inet_addr too. >> >> Cc: James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com> >> Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov> >> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org> >> Cc: Paul Moore <pmoore@...hat.com> >> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org >> Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com> > > Perhaps I'm confusing this with another patch but I though DaveM said he > wasn't going to merge these patches? I didn't like how he added completely unused bloat to various datastructures because he unconditionally put a port field into there. He removed that problem this time, but there are still a lot of things I don't like about this patch series. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists