[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130804115622.0f3d26c7@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2013 11:56:22 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Stefan Tomanek <stefan.tomanek@...tarbyte.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 v2 2/2] ip rule: add route suppression options
On Sat, 3 Aug 2013 14:23:16 +0200
Stefan Tomanek <stefan.tomanek@...tarbyte.de> wrote:
> When configuring a system with multiple network uplinks and default routes, it
> is often convenient to reference a routing table multiple times - but reject
> its routing decision if certain constraints are not met by it.
>
> Consider this setup:
>
> $ ip route add table secuplink default via 10.42.23.1
>
> $ ip rule add pref 100 table main suppress_prefixlength 0
> $ ip rule add pref 150 fwmark 0xA table secuplink
>
> With this setup, packets marked 0xA will be processed by the additional routing
> table "secuplink", but only if no suitable route in the main routing table can
> be found. By suppressing entries with a prefixlength of 0 (or less), the
> default route (/0) of the table "main" is hidden to packets processed by rule
> 100; packets traveling to destinations via more specific routes are processed
> as usual.
>
> It is also possible to suppress a routing entry if a device belonging to
> a specific interface group is to be used:
>
> $ ip rule add pref 150 table main suppress_group 1
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Tomanek <stefan.tomanek@...tarbyte.de>
Applied to net-next-3.11 branch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists