netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] netdevice: remove useless else keyword

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1375799860.2424.26.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Tue, 06 Aug 2013 07:37:40 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Cc:	Jean Sacren <sakiwit@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] netdevice: remove useless else keyword

On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 10:20 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 08/06/2013 09:32 AM, Jean Sacren wrote:
> > Clean up multiple useless else keywords. Add empty lines for
> > readability.
> 
> Hmm, don't really think this is actually needed or makes things better.

Maybe that's true.

Though this patch is pretty trivial and
I would (probably) not submit it, I think
it's a reasonable style rule to not use
else after an if() that always returns.

	if (foo)
		return bar;

	next_statement;

should be preferred over

	if (foo)
		return bar;
	else
		next_statement;

The blank lines though are a style taste.
Maybe removing the blank line before the
first if in this patch might be better.

{
	BUG_ON(!net);

	if (!dev_valid_name(name))
		return -EINVAL;
	if (strchr(name, '%'))
		return dev_alloc_name_ns(net, dev, name);
	if (__dev_get_by_name(net, name))
		return -EEXIST;
	if (dev->name != name)
		strlcpy(dev->name, name, IFNAMSIZ);

	return 0;
}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html