netdev - Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 6 [ wireless | iwlwifi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+icZUXpZaHu-FjR6FGnbkG0XEkiukEgYYbDmrSjdqNz4rWCNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 6 Aug 2013 20:35:06 +0200
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 6 [ wireless | iwlwifi | mac80211 ? ]

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
>>>> [reducing mailing lists - Stephen if you want off let us know]
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 17:58 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> $ cat /proc/version
>>>>> Linux version 3.11.0-rc4-1-wl-20130805 (sedat.dilek@...il.com@...box)
>>>>> (gcc version 4.6.3 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) ) #1 SMP Tue Aug 6
>>>>> 17:52:45 CEST 2013
>>>>>
>>>>> This kernel boots fine and has no WiFi problems.
>>>>>
>>>>> > You assume a breakage in a different area than wireless or network in general?
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> Any wild guess?
>>>>
>>>> Not really, but maybe you can pull the other trees on top again and see
>>>> if those broke it? I don't really think/hope so but it's possible that
>>>> one of my pending pull requests broke it, I guess?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hmm, I pulled in latest for-john of mac80211(-next) and
>>> iwlwifi-(fixes|next) which did not help.
>>>
>>> I am testing next-20130805 and next-20130802 to identify which
>>> Linux-next release is BROKEN.
>>>
>>
>> GOOD: next-20130801 and next-20130802
>>
>> BROKEN: next-20130805 and next-20130806
>>
>> Comparing diffs between next-20130802 and next-20130805.
>>
>
> [ To Dave and CC netdev ]
>
> [ Full thread see [1] ]
>
> The diff was not very helpful.
>
> $ cd linux-next-20130805
>
> $ git log --oneline v3.11-rc4.. | grep "Merge remote-tracking" | egrep
> 'net-next|slave-dma|wireless'
> 7f84622 Merge remote-tracking branch 'net-next/master' <--- BAD
> (before slave-dma/next)
> 3580d24 Merge remote-tracking branch 'slave-dma/next' <--- GOOD (after
> net-next/master)
> 88825c7 Merge remote-tracking branch 'wireless/master' <--- GOOD
>
> So, the culprit commit seems to be in the merge of 'net-next/master'.
>
> ( BTW, disabling IPv6 in NM/wifi-setup did not change behaviour -
> still disconnected to AP. )
>
> - Sedat -
>
> [1] http://marc.info/?t=137579712800008&r=1&w=2

Attached is a diff comparing all new commits in next-20130805.
If one of the commits smells bad to you, please let me know.

- Sedat -

Download attachment "list-of-commits-from-net-next_next-20130802-VS-next-20130805.diff" of type "application/octet-stream" (1855 bytes)