[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130806080506.GF25511@secunet.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 10:05:06 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] xfrm: Delete hold_timer when destroy policy
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 09:22:08AM +0800, Fan Du wrote:
>
>
> On 2013年08月01日 20:01, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 06:08:36PM +0800, Fan Du wrote:
> >>Both policy timer and hold_timer need to be deleted when destroy policy
> >>Bad mood today, maybe I'm wrong about this...
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Fan Du<fan.du@...driver.com>
> >>---
> >> net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> >>index d8da6b8..f7078eb 100644
> >>--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> >>+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> >>@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ void xfrm_policy_destroy(struct xfrm_policy *policy)
> >> {
> >> BUG_ON(!policy->walk.dead);
> >>
> >>- if (del_timer(&policy->timer))
> >>+ if (del_timer(&policy->timer) || del_timer(&policy->polq.hold_timer))
> >> BUG();
> >>
> >
> >The timers should be already deleted when xfrm_policy_destroy() is
> >called. This is just to check if that really happened and to
> >catch this bug if not. So it's not a bug fix, it just helps to
> >catch a potential bug. I'll consider to take this into ipsec-next
> >after some testing.
> >
>
> On the contrary, please take a look at callers of xfrm_policy_destroy.
> Code flow is as below:
>
> xfrm_policy_alloc() /* setup timer/hold_timer here */ (1)
>
> /* do something with this policy, insert or something else */
>
> goto err; /* bail out if bad things happens */
>
> return ok
>
> err:
> xfrm_policy_destroy() /*So both timers in (1) need to be deleted */
>
setup_timer() does not arm the timer, it just initializes the timer.
So the timer is not pending when xfrm_policy_destroy() is called
on error. The del_timer() in xfrm_policy_destroy() is really just
to catch a bug. That's also the reason why we call BUG() if we
delete a pending timer.
Anyway, applied to ipsec-next.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists