[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130806120442.GR5051@mwanda>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 15:04:42 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: "Rustad, Mark D" <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
"<netdev@...r.kernel.org>" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"<kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] net: remove an unneeded check
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 06:18:01PM +0000, Rustad, Mark D wrote:
> On Jul 29, 2013, at 12:15 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > "ifa->ifa_label" is an array inside the in_ifaddr struct. It can never
> > be NULL so we can remove this check.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/devinet.c b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
> > index 8d48c39..1b7f7ae 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/devinet.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
> > @@ -1124,10 +1124,7 @@ static int inet_gifconf(struct net_device *dev, char __user *buf, int len)
> > if (len < (int) sizeof(ifr))
> > break;
> > memset(&ifr, 0, sizeof(struct ifreq));
> > - if (ifa->ifa_label)
>
> Is there any possibility that this was meant to check ifa->ifa_label[0]?
It has been this way for almost 16 years and no one has complained.
I should have put that into the changelog though, you are right.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists