[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130807212410.GA22932@macbook.localnet>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 23:24:10 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, pablo@...filter.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
mph@....com, jesper.brouer@...il.com, as@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] netfilter: implement netfilter SYN proxy
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 11:05:40PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 10:59:59PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 11:06:06AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > TCP timestamps are not really used, for various reasons ...
> > >
> > > Have you taken a look at
> > >
> > > <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2013-July/035999.html>
> >
> > No, not yet, will have a look. Not sure what you mean by "TCP timestamps
> > are not really used" though. I might be biased by usually only looking at
> > Linux traffic, but I was under that impression that everyone is using
> > TCP timestamps nowadays?
>
> We had a thread here on netdev:
> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/275681/>
>
> It seems, Windows stopped using tcp timestamps at least in windows 8 by
> default.
I see. Well, that seems to be a general problem with SYN cookies, I guess
in that case the encoding Linux uses should be changed. I'll have a closer
look at the changes proposed in that thread tommorrow.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists