netdev - Re: bonding + arp monitoring fails if interface is a vlan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJk_L2FTs0bX_s+ChKY9ZvZqVTagE=LQZpwV48b1RFhgtMsd8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 7 Aug 2013 09:26:49 +0200
From:	Santiago Garcia Mantinan <manty@...ty.net>
To:	Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bonding + arp monitoring fails if interface is a vlan

2013/8/5 Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>:
>>         bond-arp_validate 0
> No, because we take the first non-vlan's interface trans_start after the patch
> which in this case is a bonding interface which also doesn't update its
> trans_start, i.e. bond over bond (or over vlans over bond) with arp monitoring
> shouldn't work.

Ok, after several days of testing it seems to work ok if I go with
arp_validate 0, going for arp_validate 1 would cause the link failure
count to be increased from time to time, is this ok?

Regards.
-- 
Manty/BestiaTester -> http://manty.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html