[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 11:46:17 +0300
From: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@...advisors.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>,
tomk@...advisors.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: Add low-latency/polling support for
UDP multicast
On 07/08/2013 23:22, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 14:51 -0500, Shawn Bohrer wrote:
>> Set the napi id for each socket in the multicast path to enable
>> low-latency/polling support.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@...advisors.com>
>> ---
>> v2 include ipv6 support
>
> This might help your workload, but I doubt it is generic enough.
>
> One UDP socket is supposed to receive traffic from many endpoints,
> so we have no guarantee all the received traffic will end on a single RX
> queue on the NIC.
>
> That's the same logic than RFS here.
>
> sk_mark_napi_id() in UDP are wrong IMHO.
>
> It should be guarded by the following test in
> __udp_queue_rcv_skb()
>
> if (inet_sk(sk)->inet_daddr) {
> sock_rps_save_rxhash(sk, skb);
> sk_mark_napi_id(sk, skb);
> }
>
> (To occur only for connected UDP sockets, where we are 100% sure all
> packets will use this same rxhash/rx queue)
This would also be safe if there is only one NIC and said NIC was
programmed to always place this socket's data on the same queue.
I don't have a good suggestion on how to detect this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists