netdev - Re: [PATCH] net:ethernet:korina.c Removed IRQF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52045B31.9000002@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 09 Aug 2013 08:30:01 +0530
From:	Kumar Gaurav <kumargauravgupta3@...il.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
	emilio@...pez.com.ar, mugunthanvnm@...com, jg1.han@...sung.com,
	hsweeten@...ionengravers.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net:ethernet:korina.c Removed IRQF_DISABLED

On Friday 09 August 2013 08:24 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 08:15 +0530, Kumar Gaurav wrote:
>> On Friday 09 August 2013 08:09 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> []
>>> And, maybe it'd be better to use IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE
>>> instead of 0.
>> I tried googling what to replace IRQF_DISABLED with but found nothing.
>> In the patch fixed earlier (not by me) it was replaced with 0 so i did
>> same. But from now on I'll use IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE. Thanks
> Maybe that's not the right thing to do.
> 0 is what's almost exclusively used.
> IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE is only used a few times.
> It's also a lot longer.
>
Sorry to poke back. But just want to confirm. I should use 
IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE and not 0 right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html