netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sctp: sctp_set_owner

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dborkman@...hat.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sctp: sctp_set_owner_w: fix panic during
 skb orphaning

From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Date: Wed,  7 Aug 2013 12:42:01 +0200

> This patch fixes the following triggered bug ...
 ...
> ... that is triggered after commit 376c7311b ("net: add a temporary sanity
> check in skb_orphan()"). What is happening is that we call sctp_set_owner_w()
> for chunks in the SCTP output path from sctp_sendmsg(). Such chunks eventually
> origin from constructors like sctp_make_chunk() where skb->sk = sk is being
> set for socket accounting. Doing a git grep -n "skb->sk" net/sctp/ shows that
> also in other places the socket pointer is being set, before issuing a
> SCTP_CMD_SEND_PKT command and the like. Since SCTP is doing it's own memory
> accounting anyway and has its own skb destructor functions, we should
> customize sctp_set_owner_w() and call skb_orphan() if we set a different
> owner of the skb than the current one in order to properly call their
> destructor function, but not run into a panic due to our non-exisiting one as
> we set sctp_wfree() destructor right after that. Otherwise, we can just skip
> orphaning and reassignment to the very same socket and only set the destructor
> handler.

This debugging check is exactly trying to catch what SCTP is doing,
setting skb->sk without also setting the destructor.

I would much rather see you reorganize and fix SCTP to behave properly
rather than coding up a check which is essentially "if skb_orphan() bug
won't trigger, call it"  That defeats the whole purpose of the check.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html