[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130809111121.GB17510@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 13:11:21 +0200
From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/6] bonding: add rcu to vlan_uses_dev() and
make bond_vlan_used() use it
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:06:51PM +0200, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
>On 08/08/2013 06:57 PM, Veaceslav Falico wrote:
>> RFC -> v1: don't add vlan_uses_dev_rcu() and change vlan_uses_dev() instead
>> v1 -> v2: remove the ASSERT_RTNL(), cause we can now be called under rcu.
>>
>> Currently, bond_vlan_used() looks for any vlan, including the pseudo-vlan
>> id 0, and always returns true if 8021q is loaded. This creates several bad
>> situations - some warnings in __bond_release_one() because it thinks that
>> we still have vlans while removing, sending LB packets with vlan id 0 and,
>> possibly, other caused by vlan id 0.
>>
>> Fix it by changing vlan_uses_dev() to use rcu_dereference_rtnl() instead of
>> rtnl_dereference(), and thus it can already be used in bond_vlan_used()
>> under rcu_read_lock().
>>
>> By the time vlan_uses_dev() returns we cannot be sure if there were no
>> vlans added/removed, so it's basicly an optimization function.
>>
>> Also, use the vlan_uses_dev() in __bond_release_one() cause the rtnl lock
>> is held there.
>>
>> For this call to be visible in bonding.h, add include <linux/if_vlan.h>,
>> and also remove it from any other bonding file, cause they all include
>> bonding.h, and thus linux/if_vlan.h.
>>
>> CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
>> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
>> CC: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
>> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
>> CC: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 1 -
>> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 3 +--
>> drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h | 10 +++++++++-
>> net/8021q/vlan_core.c | 5 ++---
>> 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>> index 3a5db7b..2684329 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
>> @@ -34,7 +34,6 @@
>> #include <linux/if_arp.h>
>> #include <linux/if_ether.h>
>> #include <linux/if_bonding.h>
>> -#include <linux/if_vlan.h>
>> #include <linux/in.h>
>> #include <net/ipx.h>
>> #include <net/arp.h>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> index 4264a76..9d1045d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> @@ -69,7 +69,6 @@
>> #include <net/arp.h>
>> #include <linux/mii.h>
>> #include <linux/ethtool.h>
>> -#include <linux/if_vlan.h>
>> #include <linux/if_bonding.h>
>> #include <linux/jiffies.h>
>> #include <linux/preempt.h>
>> @@ -1953,7 +1952,7 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev,
>> bond_set_carrier(bond);
>> eth_hw_addr_random(bond_dev);
>>
>> - if (bond_vlan_used(bond)) {
>> + if (vlan_uses_dev(bond_dev)) {
>> pr_warning("%s: Warning: clearing HW address of %s while it still has VLANs.\n",
>> bond_dev->name, bond_dev->name);
>> pr_warning("%s: When re-adding slaves, make sure the bond's HW address matches its VLANs'.\n",
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>> index 4bf52d5..9c4539e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>> #include <linux/netpoll.h>
>> #include <linux/inetdevice.h>
>> #include <linux/etherdevice.h>
>> +#include <linux/if_vlan.h>
>> #include "bond_3ad.h"
>> #include "bond_alb.h"
>>
>> @@ -267,9 +268,16 @@ struct bonding {
>> #endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_FS */
>> };
>>
>> +/* use vlan_uses_dev() if under rtnl */
>Small nitpick - I don't think this comment is necessary as both calls now reduce
>to vlan_uses_dev() and can be used interchangeably, maybe it's better to stick
>to bond_vlan_used() just for consistency everywhere.
>Anyway, I'm okay with this version as well:
Good catch, leftover from previous version.
>
>Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
Thank you.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists