[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <520BF9B0.80104@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 01:42:08 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
CC: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>, roszenrami@...il.com,
dshwatrz@...il.com, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
grant.likely@...aro.org, rob.herring@...xeda.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-velocity.c: update napi
implementation
Hello.
On 08/14/2013 06:26 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
> Drivers supporting NAPI should use a NAPI-specific function for receiving
> packets. Hence netif_rx is changed to netif_receive_skb.
> Furthermore netif_napi_del should be used in the probe and remove function
> to clean up the NAPI resource information.
> Thanks to Francois Romieu, David Shwatrz and Rami Rosen for their help on
> this patch.
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
> ---
> I still don't understand the reason for choosing netif_receive_skb,
> specifically. This patch is not tested.
This driver is not the only one with the netif_rx() used with NAPI issue.
I also overlooked this when converting drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/sh_eth.c
to NAPI. I'll try to change the call and see if netperf would behave better...
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists