netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ipv6: do not disable temp_address when reaching max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 Aug 2013 09:41:07 +0800
From:	Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
CC:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ipv6: do not disable temp_address when reaching max_address

On 2013/8/13 22:31, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 08/13/2013 10:14 AM, Ding Tianhong wrote:
> 
>> A LAN user can remotely disable temporary address which may lead
>> to privacy violatins and information disclosure.
> 
>> The reason is that the linux kernel uses the 'ipv6.max_addresses'
>> option to specify how many ipv6 addresses and interface may have.
>> The 'ipv6.regen_max_retry' (default value 3) option specifies
>> how many times the kernel will try to create a new address.
> 
>> But the kernel is not distinguish between the event of reaching
>> max_addresses for an interface and failing to generate a new address.
>> the kernel disable the temporary address after regenerate a new
>> address 'regen_max_retry' times.
> 
>> According RFC4941 3.3.7:
> 
>> ---------------------------------------
> 
>> If DAD indicates the address is already in use,
>> the node must generate a new randomized interface
>> identifier as described in section 3.2 above, and
>> repeat the previous steps as appropriate up to
>> TEMP_IDGEN_RETRIES times.
> 
>> If after TEMP_IDGEN_RETRIES consecutive attempts no
>> non-unique address was generated, the node must log
>> a system error and must not attempt to generate
>> temporary address for that interface.
> 
>> ------------------------------------------
> 
>> RFC4941 3.3.7 specifies that disabling the temp_address must happen
>> upon the address is already in use, not reach the max_address,
>> So we have to check the return err and distinguish the correct retry path.
> 
>> This fixes CVE-2013-0343
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
>> Tested-by: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@...wei.com>
>> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>> ---
>>   net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
>>   1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
>> index da4241c..99f9fd5 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
>> @@ -1134,10 +1134,27 @@ retry:
> [...]
>> +        if (PTR_ERR(ift) == -EEXIST) {
>> +            pr_info("%s: retry temporary address regeneration\n", __func__);
>> +            tmpaddr = &addr;
>> +            write_lock(&idev->lock);
>> +            goto retry;
>> +        } else
>> +            goto out;
> 
>    According to CodingStyle, both arms of the *if* statement should have {} if one has it.
> 
> WBR, Sergei
> 

thanks your opinion. I will collect feedback and resend v3 for the patch set.

regards
Ding Tianhong

> 
> .
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html