lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 14 Aug 2013 17:00:54 +0200
From:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To:	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...nulli.us, dbanerje@...mai.com,
	yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable] ipv6: restrict neighbor entry creation to output flow

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 10:53:27AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> This patch is based on 3.2.y branch, the one used by reported. Please let me
> know if it should be different. Thanks.
> 
> ---8<---
> 
> Commit 0d6a77079c475033cb622c07c5a880b392ef664e introduced a regression on
> which routes to local delivery would not work anymore. Like this:
> 
>     $ ip -6 route add local 2001::/64 dev lo
>     $ ping6 -c1 2001::9
>     PING 2001::9(2001::9) 56 data bytes
>     ping: sendmsg: Invalid argument
> 
> As this is a local delivery, that commit would not allow the creation of a
> neighbor entry and thus the packet cannot be sent.
> 
> But as TPROXY scenario actually needs to avoid the neighbor entry creation only
> for input flow, this patch now limits previous patch to input flow, keeping
> output as before that patch.
> 
> Reported-by: Debabrata Banerjee <dbavatar@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <mleitner@...hat.com>
> CC: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>

Looks good, thanks Marcelo!

Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>

David, this patch is for all stable kernels except the 3.10 series.
It does not apply cleanly throughout the whole longterm kernels but the
changes should not be too difficult to adapt. Do you take care of this
or can we do something to ease this process?

Thanks!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ