[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <520C7519.1010000@gont.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 03:28:41 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@...t.com.ar>
To: hannes@...essinduktion.org
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: RFC 6980 on Security Implications of IPv6 Fragmentation
with IPv6 Neighbor Discovery
Hi, Hannes,
Thanks so much for your timely response! -- Please find my comments
in-line...
On 08/14/2013 08:06 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 05:19:13AM -0300, Fernando Gont wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> FYI. -- this is an important piece when it comes to First Hop (i.e.,
>> "local link") Security.
>
> Thanks for the heads-up, Fernando!
>
> I sketched up a patch to protect the receiving side. I still don't know if I
> should make this behaviour default or configurable via a sysctl knob. I really
> don't want to break existing installations.
Make it the default behavior. If anything, provide a sysctl knob to
override it.
Note: In the specific case of NS/NA messages, it's impossible nowadays
to find them fragmented in a real network (we don't even have options
(other than padding) to make NS/NAs grow so large!).
> As an extra plus, we now discard packets with nested fragment headers at once.
> Those packets should never have been accepted.
Is that the "goto fail_hdr" part in your patch?
P.S.: What about RS/RA messages?
Cheers,
--
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@...t.com.ar || fgont@...networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists