[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130815102507.GA24122@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 12:25:07 +0200
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@...il.com>
Cc: Fernando Gont <fernando@...t.com.ar>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: RFC 6980 on Security Implications of IPv6 Fragmentation with IPv6 Neighbor Discovery
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 02:14:46PM +0400, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
> I'm not sure if you got my previous mails, but I'd like to know a
> couple of things:
Ah, you asked me off-list. So, for a wider audience, I copy & paste my answers
from the just answered mail. ;)
> 1) How can I test this diff ?
Actually, nothing should change at all.
Myself, I used scapy to construct some packets and send it to a system
with the patched kernel and had some printks sprinkeled in the source
while watching tcpdump.
> 2) It's developed against which git brach ? linux-next ?
Yes, I targeted linux-next. But it should apply to older kernels
without too much fuzz as well.
> 3) What will/could break with this diff in a production environment ?
RA messages could get fragmented if a speaker puts lots of options in it. I
hope all RA speakers already spread the options over multiple RAs, but I don't
know. In case the RA is fragmented it will now be dropped silently.
Thanks,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists