| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130815045701.GA3110@x61s.8.8.8.8> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 06:57:21 +0200 From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: alex.bluesman.smirnov@...il.com, dbaryshkov@...il.com, linux-zigbee-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next] 6lowpan: handle only real link-local addresses Hi David, On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 05:18:25PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com> > Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 23:17:01 +0200 > > > Ok, please let me know what should I do to submit it properly. > > What you don't understand is that just because patches aren't > related doesn't mean that their order of application doesn't > matter. > Ok. I got the information on an other mailinglist that I should not mix "features" and "fixes" in a single series. Then I just try to seperate... My first patch-serie included all patches in a single series. > So you put all the patches into a full series so that there is no > ambiguity as to what order the patches are to be applied. > Ok. > Do not ever seperate patches when you are submitting changes to the > same exact files at one time. Ok, I will remember it. Thanks and apologize for the inconvenience Regards Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists