netdev - Re: [GLIBC Patch v2] inet: avoid redefinition of some structs in kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1376875250.2742.2.camel@cr0>
Date:	Mon, 19 Aug 2013 09:20:50 +0800
From:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To:	"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@...hat.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Thomas Backlund <tmb@...eia.org>, libc-alpha@...rceware.org,
	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: [GLIBC Patch v2] inet: avoid redefinition of some structs in
 kernel

On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 11:47 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 08/15/2013 05:28 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> > 2013-08-13  Carlos O'Donell  <carlos@...hat.com>
> > 	    Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
> > 
> > 	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/bits/in.h
> > 	[_UAPI_LINUX_IN6_H]: Define __USE_KERNEL_IPV6_DEFS.
> > 	* inet/netinet/in.h: Move in_addr definition and bits/in.h inclusion
> > 	before __USE_KERNEL_IPV6_DEFS uses.
> > 	* inet/netinet/in.h [!__USE_KERNEL_IPV6_DEFS]: Define IPPROTO_MH, and
> > 	IPPROTO_BEETPH.
> > 	[__USE_KERNEL_IPV6_DEFS]: Don't define any of IPPROTO_*, in6_addr,
> > 	sockaddr_in6, or ipv6_mreq.
> 
> Cong,
> 
> Given that this is a user visible change could you please file
> a glibc bugzilla bug in sourceware[1] so we can track the commit and so
> that future users can reopen the bug to discuss any defects?

Done, http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15850


> 
> Then you need to add the BZ# to the ChangeLog, and whomever
> commits this for you will mark it fixed in the NEWS. We should
> also write up a NEWS blurb for this since it's the first explicit
> header coordination of it's kind and we should highlight that
> so developers take note and help us coordinate more headers.
> 

Should I resend this patch with BZ# included?

Thanks!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html