[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130820061914.GA26773@secunet.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:19:14 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Timo Teras <timo.teras@....fi>
Cc: Andrew Collins <bsderandrew@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ipsec smp scalability and cpu use fairness (softirqs)
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 03:41:02PM +0300, Timo Teras wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 13:56:52 +0200
> Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > I'll do some tests with current net-next on my own tomorrow and let
> > you know about the results.
>
> Yes, I've got pcrypt there. Apparently I had some of the cpu bindings
> not right, so now it's looking a lot better. But it seems that
> ksoftirqd on one of the CPUs becomes first bottleneck. I'll try to
> figure out why.
>
> Thanks on all the info so far, will continue experimenting here too.
Here are the promised test results:
I used my test boxes with two nodes (Intel Xeon X5550 @ 2.67GHz) and all
cores utilized (16 logical cores). I did iperf box to box IPsec tunnel
tests with the crypto algorithm:
pcrypt(authenc(hmac(sha1-ssse3),cbc(aes-asm)))
Throughput is at 1.70 Gbits/sec.
Same test without pcrypt, i.e. crypto algorithm:
authenc(hmac(sha1-ssse3),cbc(aes-asm))
Throughput is at 560 Mbits/sec.
Unfortunately I can't do forwarding tests, I have only two 10 Gbit NICs.
Would be nice if I could get forwarding test results from somewhere.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists