lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:46:00 +0800 From: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com> To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de> Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>, Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] can: mcp251x: Replace power callbacks with regulator API On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de> wrote: > On 08/17/2013 06:37 AM, Haojian Zhuang wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru> wrote: >>> On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 10:19:20 +0800 >>> Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 08/09/2013 03:37 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >>>>> On 08/08/2013 02:00 PM, Alexander Shiyan wrote: >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/icontrol.c | 3 -- >>>>>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/zeus.c | 46 ++++++++++---------- >>>>> >>>>> What's pxa's status of DT conversion? Do you (still) accept patches to >>>>> board files? >>>>> >>>>> Marc >>>>> >>>> >>>> Since DT conversion isn't finished, I still accept the board files. >>>> But this patch should be split into two parts. One is for pxa, and the >>>> other one is for net. >>> >>> Patch cannot be splitted because this can create hole which break git-bisect. >>> >>> In any case, I want to create a v2 with a more detailed description, and I >>> have a supplementary question for the CAN subsystem maintainers. >>> "Transciever power" is not used by any of the boards, can we remove it >>> completely? This will greatly simplify driver. >>> Thanks. >>> >>> -- >>> Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru> >> >> If you want to make the patch go through pxa tree, you need to get the Ack >> from CAN maintainer. > > The current series consists of 3 patches, only the first one touches > "arch/arm/mach-pxa", so I'd like the patches to go via linux-can. Can I > have your Acked-by for the first patch "[PATCH v2 1/3] can: mcp251x: > Replace power callbacks with regulator AP" > > Marc > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | > Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | > Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de | > Acked-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists