| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 20:40:32 +0200 From: Johannes Naab <jn@...sta.de> To: netdev@...r.kernel.org CC: mailings@...ie.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, stephen@...workplumber.org Subject: net: netem: regression/bug: using a pfifo no longer avoids reordering caused by jitter Hi, This is in relation to the "[PATCH 2/2] net: netem: always adjust now/delay when not reordering" discussion. Since the issue is not related to the proposed patch itself (but the workaround), I have taken the freedom of starting a new thread. I tried the pfifo for delay+jitter with reordering avoidance (as given on the netem website http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/networking/netem#How_to_reorder_packets_based_on_jitter.3F) in 3.11-rc4, 3.8 and 3.2 (Debian experimental, an old experimental and current stable kernels). The jitter reorder avoidance seems to work in 3.2, but no longer in 3.8 or 3.11-rc4. First the working 3.2: $ tc qdisc add dev node-net handle 1: root netem delay 1000ms 1000ms $ ping -D -n -c 25 -i 0.1 10.0.2.1 PING 10.0.2.1 (10.0.2.1) 56(84) bytes of data. [1377107794.371992] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=3 ttl=63 time=1846 ms [1377107794.372231] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=5 ttl=63 time=1630 ms [1377107794.372341] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=2 ttl=63 time=1954 ms [1377107794.372432] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=7 ttl=63 time=1414 ms [1377107794.372524] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=10 ttl=63 time=1090 ms [1377107794.372629] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=63 time=2061 ms [1377107794.372719] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=4 ttl=63 time=1738 ms [1377107794.372810] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=14 ttl=63 time=658 ms [1377107794.372901] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=11 ttl=63 time=982 ms [1377107794.372971] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=8 ttl=63 time=1306 ms [1377107794.397883] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=6 ttl=63 time=1548 ms [1377107794.603519] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=16 ttl=63 time=674 ms [1377107794.797632] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=9 ttl=63 time=1624 ms [1377107794.952395] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=12 ttl=63 time=1454 ms [1377107795.062865] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=15 ttl=63 time=1241 ms [1377107795.168301] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=24 ttl=63 time=390 ms [1377107795.263823] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=18 ttl=63 time=1118 ms [1377107795.272856] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=20 ttl=63 time=911 ms [1377107795.323775] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=19 ttl=63 time=1070 ms [1377107795.419494] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=17 ttl=63 time=1382 ms [1377107795.478443] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=13 ttl=63 time=1872 ms [1377107795.703842] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=21 ttl=63 time=1241 ms [1377107796.002957] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=25 ttl=63 time=1125 ms [1377107796.434347] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=22 ttl=63 time=1864 ms [1377107796.606394] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=23 ttl=63 time=1936 ms --- 10.0.2.1 ping statistics --- 25 packets transmitted, 25 received, 0% packet loss, time 2567ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 390.813/1365.603/2061.036/438.727 ms, pipe 20 by adding the pfifo, the reordering does not occur: $ sudo tc qdisc add dev node-net parent 1:1 pfifo limit 1000 $ sudo ping -D -n -c 25 -i 0.1 10.0.2.1 PING 10.0.2.1 (10.0.2.1) 56(84) bytes of data. [1377107865.731835] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=63 time=1855 ms [1377107865.732082] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=2 ttl=63 time=1746 ms [1377107865.732185] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=3 ttl=63 time=1638 ms [1377107865.732290] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=4 ttl=63 time=1530 ms [1377107865.786417] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=5 ttl=63 time=1476 ms [1377107865.786552] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=6 ttl=63 time=1368 ms [1377107865.978256] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=7 ttl=63 time=1452 ms [1377107865.978349] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=8 ttl=63 time=1344 ms [1377107865.978407] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=9 ttl=63 time=1236 ms [1377107866.840396] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=10 ttl=63 time=1990 ms [1377107866.840597] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=11 ttl=63 time=1882 ms [1377107866.840740] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=12 ttl=63 time=1774 ms [1377107867.020757] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=13 ttl=63 time=1847 ms [1377107867.020893] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=14 ttl=63 time=1739 ms [1377107867.020987] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=15 ttl=63 time=1631 ms [1377107867.021078] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=16 ttl=63 time=1523 ms [1377107867.021168] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=17 ttl=63 time=1415 ms [1377107867.021258] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=18 ttl=63 time=1307 ms [1377107867.021348] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=19 ttl=63 time=1207 ms [1377107867.022735] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=20 ttl=63 time=1101 ms [1377107867.757821] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=21 ttl=63 time=1736 ms [1377107867.758009] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=22 ttl=63 time=1628 ms [1377107867.832652] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=23 ttl=63 time=1595 ms [1377107867.832776] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=24 ttl=63 time=1487 ms [1377107867.832881] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=25 ttl=63 time=1379 ms --- 10.0.2.1 ping statistics --- 25 packets transmitted, 25 received, 0% packet loss, time 2577ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1101.255/1555.884/1990.917/226.825 ms, pipe 18 In 3.8 and 3.11-rc4 without pfifo (with causes reordering as currently expected): $ sudo ping -D -n -c 25 -i 0.1 10.0.2.1 PING 10.0.2.1 (10.0.2.1) 56(84) bytes of data. [1377108036.574818] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=63 time=252 ms [1377108037.846016] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=4 ttl=63 time=1207 ms [1377108037.846200] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=5 ttl=63 time=1100 ms [1377108037.846287] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=8 ttl=63 time=776 ms [1377108037.846399] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=6 ttl=63 time=992 ms [1377108037.846483] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=3 ttl=63 time=1308 ms [1377108038.025777] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=10 ttl=63 time=740 ms [1377108038.072852] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=2 ttl=63 time=1643 ms [1377108038.288748] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=9 ttl=63 time=1111 ms [1377108038.317722] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=11 ttl=63 time=924 ms [1377108038.369579] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=13 ttl=63 time=760 ms [1377108038.384918] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=7 ttl=63 time=1423 ms [1377108038.704846] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=14 ttl=63 time=987 ms [1377108038.852763] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=16 ttl=63 time=926 ms [1377108039.158401] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=21 ttl=63 time=724 ms [1377108039.213823] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=12 ttl=63 time=1712 ms [1377108039.310065] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=18 ttl=63 time=1183 ms [1377108039.457295] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=25 ttl=63 time=604 ms [1377108039.560758] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=15 ttl=63 time=1735 ms [1377108039.847344] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=17 ttl=63 time=1821 ms [1377108039.922450] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=23 ttl=63 time=1273 ms [1377108040.189117] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=19 ttl=63 time=1955 ms [1377108040.233637] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=20 ttl=63 time=1899 ms [1377108040.430303] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=22 ttl=63 time=1889 ms [1377108040.437195] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=24 ttl=63 time=1686 ms --- 10.0.2.1 ping statistics --- 25 packets transmitted, 25 received, 0% packet loss, time 2531ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 252.930/1225.728/1955.892/459.288 ms, pipe 16 Adding the pfifo does not avoid the reordering (which is a regression against 3.2). $ sudo tc qdisc add dev node-net parent 1:1 pfifo limit 1000 $ sudo ping -D -n -c 25 -i 0.1 10.0.2.1 PING 10.0.2.1 (10.0.2.1) 56(84) bytes of data. [1377108141.816852] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=63 time=1260 ms [1377108141.817114] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=7 ttl=63 time=611 ms [1377108141.817230] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=3 ttl=63 time=1043 ms [1377108141.817336] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=4 ttl=63 time=935 ms [1377108141.842461] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=10 ttl=63 time=313 ms [1377108142.029281] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=2 ttl=63 time=1363 ms [1377108142.085116] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=6 ttl=63 time=987 ms [1377108142.136125] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=8 ttl=63 time=822 ms [1377108142.359697] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=9 ttl=63 time=938 ms [1377108142.456998] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=11 ttl=63 time=819 ms [1377108142.779780] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=20 ttl=63 time=202 ms [1377108142.779960] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=15 ttl=63 time=719 ms [1377108142.815326] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=13 ttl=63 time=962 ms [1377108142.830840] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=5 ttl=63 time=1841 ms [1377108143.099230] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=23 ttl=63 time=207 ms [1377108143.299404] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=18 ttl=63 time=929 ms [1377108143.333906] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=21 ttl=63 time=648 ms [1377108143.391823] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=19 ttl=63 time=921 ms [1377108143.402795] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=12 ttl=63 time=1657 ms [1377108143.496919] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=16 ttl=63 time=1335 ms [1377108143.680456] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=17 ttl=63 time=1411 ms [1377108143.781552] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=14 ttl=63 time=1820 ms [1377108144.020711] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=24 ttl=63 time=1029 ms [1377108144.374671] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=25 ttl=63 time=1283 ms [1377108144.447944] 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_req=22 ttl=63 time=1657 ms --- 10.0.2.1 ping statistics --- 25 packets transmitted, 25 received, 0% packet loss, time 2534ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 202.462/1029.004/1841.404/445.533 ms, pipe 18 Can anyone confirm this behavior? Is the documentation out of date, or is that a regression? Best regards, Johannes -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists