netdev - Re: [PATCH v3] r8169: fix invalid register dump

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4578926.BDvSIdbm2b@al>
Date:	Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:13:35 +0200
From:	Peter Wu <lekensteyn@...il.com>
To:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, nic_swsd@...ltek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] r8169: fix invalid register dump

On Wednesday 21 August 2013 22:53:25 Francois Romieu wrote:
> Peter Wu <lekensteyn@...il.com> :
> [...]
> 
> > Please find the updated patch below. There may be differences in lines
> > because net-next has the r8169,sis190 patch and net the WOL fix.
> > 
> > Can I consider Francois reply[1] as Acked-by?
> 
> Yes, provided you insert an empty line between declarations and code.
Done, new patch will arrive in a minute.

> You may / should send patches as normal submissions. It will probably
> be easier for davem to use and you can always raise questions or add
> minor remarks in the "--- ... diff" section.

I noticed that patchwork also recognized submissions that are appended to a 
mail, so I tried that out ;-) Well, apparantly it does not work well with git, 
so I will just send a new patch with a useful In-Reply-To header.

Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html