[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52165A60.5030602@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:37:20 +0200
From: Daniel Mack <zonque@...il.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, ujhelyi.m@...il.com,
mugunthanvnm@...com, vaibhav.bedia@...com, d-gerlach@...com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] net: ethernet: cpsw: add optional third memory region
for CONTROL module
Hi Sergei,
On 22.08.2013 20:12, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>> @@ -2012,6 +2013,27 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> goto clean_runtime_disable_ret;
>> }
>>
>> + /* If the control memory region is unspecified, continue without it.
>> + * If it is specified, but we're unable to reserve it, bail. */
>
> According to Documentation/CodingStyle, the networking code's preferred
> style of multi-line comments is this:
>
> /* Bla
> * bla
> */
Ok, thanks. Will fix.
>> + goto clean_runtime_disable_ret;
>> + }
>> + priv->gmii_sel_reg = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res->start,
>> + resource_size(res));
>> + if (!priv->gmii_sel_reg) {
>> + dev_err(priv->dev, "unable to map control i/o region\n");
>> + goto clean_runtime_disable_ret;
>> + }
>
> Why not use devm_ioremap_resource() instead of the above sequence?
Right, that's much nicer. I'll also do that for the devm rework patch.
Thank you for your review!
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists