netdev - Re: [PATCH V3] ipv6: handle Redirect ICMP Message with no Redirected Header option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5215692B.5090206@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:28:11 +0800
From:	Duan Jiong <duanj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To:	hannes@...essinduktion.org
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] ipv6: handle Redirect ICMP Message with no Redirected
 Header option

于 2013年08月21日 19:17, Hannes Frederic Sowa 写道:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 03:14:12PM +0800, Duan Jiong wrote:
>> From: Duan Jiong <duanj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
>>
>> rfc 4861 says the Redirected Header option is optional, so
>> the kernel should not drop the Redirect Message that has no
>> Redirected Header option. In this patch, the function
>> ip6_redirect_no_header() is introduced to deal with that
>> condition.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Duan Jiong <duanj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> 
> Sorry for being so picky about local socket delivery before. You were right
> all along.
> 
> I just tested and reviewed this patch and everything is fine:
> 
> Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> 
> Just out of curiosity, can you tell because of which devices you did
> this patch?
In fact, i did this patch just because i want to learn more about the
ipv6 implemention.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html