[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <521785C5.9000903@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:54:45 -0400
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
To: Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>
CC: Daniel Mack <zonque@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<nsekhar@...com>, <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <ujhelyi.m@...il.com>,
<mugunthanvnm@...com>, <vaibhav.bedia@...com>, <d-gerlach@...com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] net: ethernet: cpsw: introduce ti,am3352-cpsw
compatible string
On Friday 23 August 2013 11:22 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> Hi Santosh,
>
> [...]
>
>>> +static const struct of_device_id cpsw_of_mtable[] = {
>>> + {
>>> + .compatible = "ti,am3352-cpsw",
>> I didn't notice this earlier, but can't you use the IP version
>> as a compatible instead of using a SOC name. Whats really SOC specific
>> on this IP ? Sorry i have missed any earlier discussion on this but
>> this approach doesn't seem good. Its like adding SOC checks in the
>> driver subsystem.
>
> Hehe, welcome to the club!
> I keep arguing about that as well :-)
>
> I think we should create a Facebook group: "against-the-soc-version-in-the-compatible-string".
>
Indeed !!
Regards,
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists