[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5217A68F.2050302@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 22:14:39 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Dong Fang <yp.fangdong@...il.com>
CC: pablo@...filter.org, kaber@...sh.net, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu,
davem@...emloft.net, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: avoid array overflow in nf_register_hook
Hello.
On 08/24/2013 07:07 AM, Dong Fang wrote:
> This patch fix the array overflow in nf_register_hook function
> Signed-off-by: Dong Fang <yp.fangdong@...il.com>
> ---
> net/netfilter/core.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/core.c b/net/netfilter/core.c
> index 2217363..819eee1 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/core.c
> @@ -68,8 +68,11 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(nf_hook_mutex);
> int nf_register_hook(struct nf_hook_ops *reg)
> {
> struct nf_hook_ops *elem;
> - int err;
> + int err = -EINVAL;
>
> + if (reg->pf >= NFPROTO_NUMPROTO || reg->hooknum >= NF_MAX_HOOKS)
> + return err;
Why not just return -EINVAL and avoid unneeded 'err' initialization?
> +
> err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&nf_hook_mutex);
> if (err < 0)
> return err;
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists