netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] cpsw: support for control module register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5217B450.6060006@ti.com>
Date:	Sat, 24 Aug 2013 00:43:20 +0530
From:	Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>
To:	Daniel Mack <zonque@...il.com>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bcousson@...libre.com>,
	<nsekhar@...com>, <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	<davem@...emloft.net>, <ujhelyi.m@...il.com>,
	<vaibhav.bedia@...com>, <d-gerlach@...com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] cpsw: support for control module register

On Saturday 24 August 2013 12:23 AM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> Note that for personal reasons, I won't be able to work on that patch
> set for two weeks, starting from a few hours from now. If there are any
> more objections or comments, I'll catch up after that period. Or if
> anyone wants to make minor changes to my patches and resubmit them,
> I'd also be fine with that :)
>
> The compatible discussion is still ongoing, but I'd rather submit what
> I got until now, and I'm also still convinced that having
> ti,am3352-cpsw is still the best we can do.
Apart from the DT compatibility discussion this patch series looks good
to me.

Acked-by: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>

Regards
Mugunthan V N
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html