netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] genl: Hold reference on correct module while netlink-dump.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1377242625.14021.5.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>
Date:	Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:23:45 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
Cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] genl: Hold reference on correct module while
 netlink-dump.


> +extern int __genl_register_family(struct genl_family *family, struct module *module);

Why add an extra argument instead of just assigning family->module in
the inline wrapper(s):

static inline int genl_register_family(struct genl_family *family)
{
	family->module = THIS_MODULE;
	return __genl_register_family(family);
}

Although I guess it doesn't really make a big difference. Just curious
if there was a reason you decided to do it this way.

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html