netdev - Re: Problematic commits in the ipsec tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130826094145.GK26773@secunet.com>
Date:	Mon, 26 Aug 2013 11:41:45 +0200
From:	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problematic commits in the ipsec tree

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 02:49:11PM +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> 
> This could be the replacement for patch 1/2 to reassemble old behaviour
> without touching ip6_skb_dst_mtu if the socket type is not an IPv6 one.
> 
> I would still like to look if we could correctly handle *_PMTUDISC_PROBE one
> day and fallback to dst_mtu(dst->path) if possible. So I don't know if
> removing xfrm_skb_dst_mtu is good style and would just make churn in the git
> history. What do you think?

Currently I think we can call dst_mtu() unconditionally from
__xfrm6_output(), then we would not need xfrm_skb_dst_mtu().
But this needs further investigation, IPsec pmtu discovery
was frequently broken in the past and I don't want to break
it again.

> 
> [PATCH ipsec 1/2] xfrm: revert ipv4 mtu determination to dst_mtu
> 
> In commit 0ea9d5e3e0e03a63b11392f5613378977dae7eca ("xfrm: introduce
> helper for safe determination of mtu") I switched the determination of
> ipv4 mtus from dst_mtu to ip_skb_dst_mtu. This was an error because in
> case of IP_PMTUDISC_PROBE we fall back to the interface mtu, which is
> never correct for ipv4 ipsec.
> 
> This patch partly reverts 0ea9d5e3e0e03a63b11392f5613378977dae7eca
> ("xfrm: introduce helper for safe determination of mtu").
> 

I think with this and you other patch, we get the all the
interfamily tunnel problems fixed for now. Everything else
should be done in ipsec-next.

Please resend the whole patchset, so we can get it fixed soon.

Tanks a lot!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html