[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130827142059.GA23120@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:20:59 +0200
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: Duan Jiong <duanj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6:examine the IP source address legitimacy
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:42:24PM +0800, Duan Jiong wrote:
> From: Duan Jiong <duanj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
>
> RFC4861 8.1:
> The IP source address of the Redirect is the
> same as the current first-hop router for the
> specified ICMP Destination Address.
>
> Signed-off-by: Duan Jiong <duanj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/route.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index 8d9a93e..d4f0f72 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -1685,6 +1685,7 @@ static int ip6_route_del(struct fib6_config *cfg)
> static void rt6_do_redirect(struct dst_entry *dst, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
> + struct ipv6hdr *iph = ipv6_hdr(skb);
> struct netevent_redirect netevent;
> struct rt6_info *rt, *nrt = NULL;
> struct ndisc_options ndopts;
> @@ -1745,7 +1746,7 @@ static void rt6_do_redirect(struct dst_entry *dst, struct sock *sk, struct sk_bu
> }
>
> rt = (struct rt6_info *) dst;
> - if (rt == net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry) {
> + if (rt == net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry || !ipv6_addr_equal(&rt->rt6i_gateway, &iph->saddr)) {
> net_dbg_ratelimited("rt6_redirect: source isn't a valid nexthop for redirect target\n");
> return;
> }
Hmm, that's difficult...
There was once this check:
/*
* RFC 2461 specifies that redirects should only be
* accepted if they come from the nexthop to the target.
* Due to the way default routers are chosen, this notion
* is a bit fuzzy and one might need to check all default
* routers.
*/
if (!ipv6_addr_equal(saddr, &rt->rt6i_gateway)) {
if (rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_DEFAULT) {
struct rt6_info *rt1;
read_lock(&rt6_lock);
for (rt1 = ip6_routing_table.leaf; rt1; rt1 = rt1->u.next) {
if (ipv6_addr_equal(saddr, &rt1->rt6i_gateway)) {
dst_hold(&rt1->u.dst);
dst_release(&rt->u.dst);
read_unlock(&rt6_lock);
rt = rt1;
goto source_ok;
}
}
read_unlock(&rt6_lock);
}
if (net_ratelimit())
printk(KERN_DEBUG "rt6_redirect: source isn't a valid nexthop "
"for redirect target\n");
goto out;
}
And even got more complicated in commit
a6279458c534d01ccc39498aba61c93083ee0372 ("NDISC: Search over all possible
rules on receipt of redirect.").
Today we even have ECMP routes maybe making this decision even a bit
more complicated. But I agree, there should be a check, but it will be
a bit more complicated.
Greetings,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists