[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5220D15A.1070308@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:07:38 -0700
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/6] bonding: remove the no effect lock for bond_3ad_lacpdu_recv()
On 08/30/2013 03:04 AM, Ding Tianhong wrote:
> There is no pointer needed read lock protection, remove the unnecessary lock
> and improve performance for the 3ad recv path.
Improve performance by how much? For example, by how much is service
demand lower on a netperf TCP_STREAM or TCP_RR test through a bond. I
suppose that applies not only to this specific patch to to the set as a
whole.
rick jones
>
> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
> Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
> index 7a3860f..c134f43 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
> @@ -2494,9 +2494,7 @@ int bond_3ad_lacpdu_recv(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bond,
> if (!lacpdu)
> return ret;
>
> - read_lock(&bond->lock);
> ret = bond_3ad_rx_indication(lacpdu, slave, skb->len);
> - read_unlock(&bond->lock);
> return ret;
> }
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists