netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v10 11/11] ipv6: Add generic UDP Tunnel segmentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALnjE+rKhTKK6wptN=dwkaEEj9T0R-vu9Fr0q+xiGZQjLUfbFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:14:10 -0700
From:	Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
To:	Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v10 11/11] ipv6: Add generic UDP Tunnel segmentation

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:16 AM, Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-08-28 at 10:55 -0700, Pravin Shelar wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com> wrote:
>> > From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
>> >
>> > Similar to commit 731362674580cb0c696cd1b1a03d8461a10cf90a
>> > (tunneling: Add generic Tunnel segmentation)
>> >
>> Can we factor out ipv4-udp-tunnel code so that there is no duplicating code?
>
> Probably we can, but it will make code review harder? Or you mean doing
> it in a separated patch? If you insist, I can do it in a separated
> patch.
>

I doubt it makes review any harder. But separate patch is also fine with me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html