netdev - Re: [PATCH V2 6/6] vhost_net: correctly limit the max pending buffers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52244E52.3060408@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 02 Sep 2013 16:37:38 +0800
From:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 6/6] vhost_net: correctly limit the max pending buffers

On 09/02/2013 02:30 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 09/02/2013 01:56 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:29:22PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> >> As Michael point out, We used to limit the max pending DMAs to get better cache
>>> >> utilization. But it was not done correctly since it was one done when there's no
>>> >> new buffers submitted from guest. Guest can easily exceeds the limitation by
>>> >> keeping sending packets.
>>> >>
>>> >> So this patch moves the check into main loop. Tests shows about 5%-10%
>>> >> improvement on per cpu throughput for guest tx. But a 5% drop on per cpu
>>> >> transaction rate for a single session TCP_RR.
>> > Any explanation for the drop? single session TCP_RR is unlikely to
>> > exceed VHOST_MAX_PEND, correct?
> Unlikely to exceed. Recheck the result, looks like it was not stable
> enough. Will re-test and report.

Re-tested with more iterations, result shows no difference on TCP_RR
test and 5%-10% improvement on per cpu throughput for guest tx.

Will post V3 soon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html