lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <522661EA.2090506@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:25:46 +0200
From:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To:	Jean Sacren <sakiwit@...il.com>
CC:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
	Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: ipv6: tcp: fix potential use after free in tcp_v6_do_rcv

On 09/03/2013 11:59 PM, Jean Sacren wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 13:35:17 -0700
>>
>> How did you get your conclusion ?
>
> If one changes one line of code, doesn't one own that line?

The question is not about who currently "owns" the line, but who
first *introduced* an error.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ