[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mwnuqrrx.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 09:38:10 +0200
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kaber@...sh.net, jiri@...nulli.us,
linville@...driver.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, j@...fi,
libertas-dev@...ts.infradead.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, forest@...ttletooquiet.net,
stephen@...workplumber.org, dan.carpenter@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/9] set addr_assign_type when inheriting a dev_addr
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 18:08:43 +0200
>
>> Copying the dev_addr from a parent device is an operation
>> common to a number of drivers. The addr_assign_type should
>> be updated accordingly, either by reusing the value from
>> the source device or explicitly indicating that the address
>> is stolen by setting addr_assign_type to NET_ADDR_STOLEN.
>>
>> This patch set adds a helper copying both the dev_addr and
>> the addr_assign_type, and use this helper in drivers which
>> don't currently set the addr_assign_type. Using NET_ADDR_STOLEN
>> might be more appropriate in some of these cases. Please
>> let me know, and I'll update the patch accordingly.
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - assuming addr_len == ETH_ALEN to allow optimized memcpy
>> - dropped the vt6656 patch due to addr_len being unset in that driver
>
> Looks good, series applied, thanks.
Thanks. But it doesn't look like it ended up in net-next? Or am I
missing something (again)?
Bjørn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists