[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130903090340.GB4351@elgon.mountain>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 12:03:40 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Andrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-x25@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] x25: add a sanity check parsing X.25 facilities
This was found with a manual audit and I don't have a reproducer. We
limit ->calling_len and ->called_len when we get them from
copy_from_user() in x25_ioctl() so when they come from skb->data then
we should cap them there as well.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
---
Possibly should be applied to -stable. My guess is that this leads to
memory corruption, but I don't know.
diff --git a/net/x25/x25_facilities.c b/net/x25/x25_facilities.c
index 66c63873..b825325 100644
--- a/net/x25/x25_facilities.c
+++ b/net/x25/x25_facilities.c
@@ -156,6 +156,8 @@ int x25_parse_facilities(struct sk_buff *skb, struct x25_facilities *facilities,
case X25_FAC_CALLING_AE:
if (p[1] > X25_MAX_DTE_FACIL_LEN || p[1] <= 1)
return -1;
+ if (p[2] > X25_MAX_AE_LEN)
+ return -1;
dte_facs->calling_len = p[2];
memcpy(dte_facs->calling_ae, &p[3], p[1] - 1);
*vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_CALLING_AE;
@@ -163,6 +165,8 @@ int x25_parse_facilities(struct sk_buff *skb, struct x25_facilities *facilities,
case X25_FAC_CALLED_AE:
if (p[1] > X25_MAX_DTE_FACIL_LEN || p[1] <= 1)
return -1;
+ if (p[2] > X25_MAX_AE_LEN)
+ return -1;
dte_facs->called_len = p[2];
memcpy(dte_facs->called_ae, &p[3], p[1] - 1);
*vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_CALLED_AE;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists