netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] random: add prandom_u32_range and prandom_u32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1378310099.1787.9.camel@joe-AO722>
Date:	Wed, 04 Sep 2013 08:54:59 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] random: add prandom_u32_range and
 prandom_u32_max helpers

On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 14:37 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> We have implemented the same function over and over, so introduce
> generic helpers that unify these implementations in order to migrate
> such code to use them. Make the API similarly to randomize_range()
> for consistency. prandom_u32_range() generates numbers in [start, end]
> interval and prandom_u32_max() generates numbers in [0, end] interval.

I think these helpers can in many cases cause
poorer compiler generated object code.

> +/**
> + * prandom_u32_range - return a random number in interval [start, end]
> + * @start: lower interval endpoint
> + * @end: higher interval endpoint
> + *
> + * Returns a number that is in the given interval:
> + *
> + *     [...... <range> .....]
> + *   start                  end
> + *
> + * Callers need to make sure that start <= end. Note that the result
> + * depends on PRNG being well distributed in [0, ~0U] space. Here we
> + * use maximally equidistributed combined Tausworthe generator.
> + */
> +static inline u32 prandom_u32_range(u32 start, u32 end)
> +{
> +	return (u32)(((u64) prandom_u32() * (end + 1 - start)) >> 32) + start;
> +}

This is effectively:

	return (prandom_u32() % (end - start)) + start;

and if start and end are constant, gcc can optimize the
division by constant to a 32 bit multiply/shift/add.

I think if you add __builtin_constant_p tests for start
and end and expand the code a little you can still get
the optimizations done.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html