[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130904082639.5c5e3bb4@griffin>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 08:26:39 +0200
From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
To: Jean Sacren <sakiwit@...il.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: ipv6: tcp: fix potential use after free in
tcp_v6_do_rcv
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 18:51:57 -0600, Jean Sacren wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:29:12 -0700
> >
> > On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 15:59 -0600, Jean Sacren wrote:
> > > From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> > > Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 13:35:17 -0700
> > > >
> > > > How did you get your conclusion ?
> > >
> > > If one changes one line of code, doesn't one own that line?
> > >
> >
> > 'Owning' like he is the guy who can sell it ? OK I understand now
> > so many people send 'cleanups' ;)
>
> 'Owning' like he is the guy who is responsible for the change. Whether
> you understand it or not, that's your own business.
>
> The idea was by taking one example to determine who is really to blame
> for: Is the one passing on the bug responsible? Thanks to Daniel
> Borkmann for the answer.
Eric is correct, the bug was introduced by me.
Sorry for it. Daniel, thanks for fixing it.
Acked-by: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
--
Jiri Benc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists