netdev - Re: [Xen-devel] xen-netback: count number required slots for an skb more carefully

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5226EA1B.1030303@oracle.com>
Date:	Wed, 04 Sep 2013 16:06:51 +0800
From:	annie li <annie.li@...cle.com>
To:	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
CC:	Matt Wilson <msw@...ux.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	xen-devel@...ts.xen.org,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	msw@...zon.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen-netback: count number required slots for an skb
 more carefully


On 2013-9-4 15:38, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 02:56:20PM +0800, annie li wrote:
>> On 2013-9-4 14:04, Matt Wilson wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 10:25:59AM +0800, annie li wrote:
>>>> On 2013-9-4 5:53, Wei Liu wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>>> Matt, do you fancy sending the final version? IIRC the commit message
>>>>> needs to be re-written. I personally still prefer Matt's solution as
>>>>> it a) make efficient use of the ring, b) uses ring pointers to
>>>>> calculate slots which is most accurate, c) removes the dependence on
>>>>> MAX_SKB_FRAGS in guest RX path.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, we should get this fixed ASAP.
>>>> Totally agree. This issue is easy to be reproduced with large MTU.
>>>> It is better to upstream the fix soon in case others hit it and
>>>> waste time to fix it.
>>> I'd like to go with Xi's proposed patch that I posed earlier. The main
>>> thing that's kept me from sending a final version is lack of time to
>>> retest against a newer kernel.
>>>
>>> Could someone help out with that? I probably can't get to it until the
>>> end of the week.
>> I can rebase it. Since wei's NAPI &1:1 model patch went into
>> net-next already, it should not be able to applied directly.
>>
> I think this one should go to net then queue up for stable, not
> net-next.
If so, that would be easier. It is almost end of the day here, and I do 
not have enough time to test it until tomorrow. Please go ahead with it 
if you have time.

Thanks
Annie
> Wei.
>
>> Thanks
>> Annie
>>> Sorry for the delay. :-(
>>>
>>> --msw

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html