[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130905042045.GD15824@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 00:20:45 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [rfc] suspicious indentation in do_tcp_setsockopt
What's the intent here ?
This ?
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index b2f6c74..95544e4 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -2454,10 +2454,11 @@ static int do_tcp_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level,
case TCP_THIN_DUPACK:
if (val < 0 || val > 1)
err = -EINVAL;
- else
+ else {
tp->thin_dupack = val;
if (tp->thin_dupack)
tcp_disable_early_retrans(tp);
+ }
break;
case TCP_REPAIR:
Or this ...
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index b2f6c74..187c5a4 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -2456,8 +2456,9 @@ static int do_tcp_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level,
err = -EINVAL;
else
tp->thin_dupack = val;
- if (tp->thin_dupack)
- tcp_disable_early_retrans(tp);
+
+ if (tp->thin_dupack)
+ tcp_disable_early_retrans(tp);
break;
case TCP_REPAIR:
I'll submit the right patch in the right form once I know what was intended.
The former seems more 'correct' to me, but I'm unsure if that could break something.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists